Thursday, July 24, 2008

Celia Lury, “‘Contemplating a Self-portait as a Pharmacist’: A Trade Mark Style of Doing Art and Science.”

In her discussion of Damien Hirst, Celia Lury discusses the way in which a brand name is now the “mark of the organisation of a set of relations between products in time” (Lury, p94) rather than being the “mark of an originary relationship between producer and products.” (Lury, p94) This is part of a broader discussion regarding the nature of the author function.
With this in mind, Lury highlights the nature of Hirst’s spot paintings as elements in a series, indexed by the logo that is Hirst’s name. Here Lury cites Raymond Williams and his ideas about ‘flow’. The example given concerns television programming and the way in which the interval between programs has changed over time. Earlier in television’s history, the end of one program was distinct from the beginning of the next one. The result was a “published sequence of discreet programs.” (Lury, p97) Now, the interval blurs this clear division via the use of advertising and broadcasting company ‘idents’. Consequently, the sequence is turned into a flow, a “shifting series of units, of products, images and events.” (Lury, p97)
This idea connects to other issues that I am currently researching which have also been covered by earlier Critical Studies readings. One way of summarising these issues is to point to our increasing inability to distinguish between individual elements within a system. This issue was addressed by Lane Relyea in ‘All-Over and at Once’ and also comes up in Hal Foster’s book Design and Crime, via a critique of our overly designed lives. The example of television intervals is also addressed specifically in a program on BBC4. Charlie Brooker’s Screenwipe takes a caustic and cynically humourous look at various aspects of television content, such as presenters, advertising and reality TV. In Episode 2, Series 4, Screenwipe has a false ending at the beginning of the show that leads into a mimicking of the indiscreet interval. Charlie Brooker’s dialogue attacks the way in which a program’s credits are squeezed to make room for promotional content, protesting against the informational noise this generates. The moment of contemplation that might have otherwise existed is disabled, thereby reducing the viewer’s ability to digest the experience of the previous program.

References

Celia, Lury, “‘Contemplating a Self-portait as a Pharmacist’: A Trade Mark Style of Doing Art and Science,” in Theory, Culture, Society, Vol.22 / 1, London, pp93-110.

Charlie Brooker’s Screenwipe, BBC4 (Series 4 originally screened in the UK between September 25, 2007 and 19 December 19, 2007)

Episode 2, Series 4 can be watched here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYxhMj3DsB4

Foster, Hal, Design and Crime, London, 2002.

Relyea, Lane, ‘Allover and at Once’, in X-tra Contemporary Art Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, pp3-23.

3 comments:

Nicola said...

Hi Sean, I liked the reference in the article to the silent intervals in radio - it seems impossible to imagine silence on the radio now - Im sure it would make people quite panicky. Im sure humans aren't meant to cope with such a high level of noise and visual stimulation as we often do now - I did a run through the warehouse on the weekend and was surprised at the intrusiveness of the advertising. There was a monitor next to me in the aisle playing warehouse ads - and also ads + the jingle playing in the shop - couldn't figure out why I was being advertised to when I was already in the shop.

Leila 001 said...

I noticed that many of our Critical Studies readings contain a repeating idea that stresses out that we are living in “the time of change“. The truth is that people have always lived in the time of change, it’s just that changes of previous generations don’t seem as urgent and as stressful to present generation as the events of current time. It may be directed by the consequence of personal involvement and direct effect by present-day events coupled with unknowing the outcomes of current global conflicts and trends. This text also discusses many thing that are called new and revolutionary, like combining art and science, etc that are just a fresh twist on really old and famous ideas.

figarlick68 said...

The content of television programming is not just being squashed by the ad breaks, it is being limited by the ads for the same program you are watching which preceed the ad breaks so that you come back to it after the break. The actual content is also shortened by the summing up of what you might have missed if you have only just tuned into the program after the ad break. Basically the TV hour is 45 minutes in New Zealand (disgusting) but you can shave off at least another 2 1/2 minutes of program time for these "whats coming up next" and "what you missed" sequences. There is no pleasure in watching a program and really getting into the story anymore as television programmers seem to think all their viewers suffer from ADHD.